|
Technobabble Post your general Need for Help questions here.
• Lossy or Lossless? Moderators |
|
Thread Tools |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Reseeding question
In relation to a video, years back, I was told by one of the video mods, that the md5 of the reseed had to match the md5 of the original post.
Does this approach apply as well to audio reseeds? (And yes, I know it would be ffp or shntool md5 files instead of the standard md5 that would be involved with audio reseeds.) I did take a look at the FAQ, but didn't find anything that pertained, (likely due to my poor searching,) so if this written down somewhere, a link to that would be welcome. Follow up question: If my understanding is correct, if the st5 of a reseed doesn't match the original post's st5, the audio has been altered. Am I getting that part right? No members have liked this post.
Last edited by mwonter; 2017-10-22 at 11:46 AM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Reseeding question
Well...depends. Does every file not match the md55, or maybe just something like the text file?
One thing that will change the md5 without actually altering the audio files is if they were tagged after the initial seeding. I'm not sure, but I would think if you listed it as a reseed and noted that the md5 has changed you should be OK. Just means nobody else can likely help you seed it with their files.
__________________
DON'T MESSAGE ME FOR RE-SEEDS. I DO NOT DO THEM! AND UNLESS THEY WERE RECORDED THAT WAY, THERE WILL BE NO MORE 16 BIT VERSIONS. No members have liked this post.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Reseeding question
Let me try and narrow down my question.
Should the ffp or st5 of a reseed match the ffp or st5 of the original, and would not any mismatch show the audio has been altered? No members have liked this post.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Reseeding question
As I said before...if the files were tagged after, then the md5 won't match, although the actual audio hasn't been altered.
Do you have ffp's? Tagging won't alter them.
__________________
DON'T MESSAGE ME FOR RE-SEEDS. I DO NOT DO THEM! AND UNLESS THEY WERE RECORDED THAT WAY, THERE WILL BE NO MORE 16 BIT VERSIONS. No members have liked this post.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Reseeding question
How do I tell if a show that claims to be a reseed has had the audio altered or not?
No members have liked this post.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Reseeding question
If somebody altered the audio files wouldn't they call it a "remaster"? Reseed generally means nothing has changed, although you often see minor changes such as tagging, updated text files, etc.
__________________
DON'T MESSAGE ME FOR RE-SEEDS. I DO NOT DO THEM! AND UNLESS THEY WERE RECORDED THAT WAY, THERE WILL BE NO MORE 16 BIT VERSIONS. No members have liked this post.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Reseeding question
Thanks dorrcoq!
I did re-look at the FAQ and finally found the concerned section, under "Audio BitTorrent Seeding Policy", part 5. "On the same token, once a show has been ripped to lossless media format, burning to a CD and then re-extracting is an extraneous step that often-times results in errors. FLAC, APE, or SHN sets that circulate may not be burned to audio CD and then re-traded or re-seeded. In otherwords, nothing like flac > CDR > (extraction method > wav >) flac. Please archive and trade only the original lossless files or acoustically identical alternate formats (verify this with st5s - see the Checksum Types FAQ). CDR generations are bad for the trading pool, and unless all versions of the bootleg circulate only on CDR, it will not be permitted here." Thank goodness, the "reseed" I was suspicious of is indeed no good, and this all hasn't been an exercise in futility. No members have liked this post.
|
The Traders' Den |
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
Reseeding my own show - weslystoones | Technobabble | 4 | 2016-08-26 05:17 PM | |
Reseeding Old Torrents... - Intexity | Technobabble | 0 | 2013-08-23 02:19 PM | |
Newbie question about altering file info and reseeding - islandraider | Technobabble | 2 | 2010-08-13 06:22 PM | |
Reseeding question - splumer | Technobabble | 9 | 2008-04-04 01:14 PM |
|
|