|
Technobabble Post your general Need for Help questions here.
• Lossy or Lossless? Moderators |
|
Thread Tools |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Re: What about High Definition streams?
Quote:
I mean it's a shame, HD is truely worth the hassle. Sure broadcast HD is in another dimension, but amateur HD can do it, too. Tool 08/12/2007 in HD is cool, RATM @ Rock im Park 08 in HD is bloody awesome synched with DaGobert's audio. Quote:
Right now the standard Mac app for encoding is MainConcepts encoder, I do not own that one and it only takes QuickTime files, so I had to convert the .m2t streams up to HD MotionJPEG@75% - that should be 80 GB, maybe 120 GB per show. On the other hand Apple's Compressor produces HD Mpeg2, but no authoring. Newer versions of Comprossor get you HD H264, but I heard the quality sucks. I once took the HD footage of Tool's "Forty Six & Two" of 08/12/2007, converted it up to MotionJPEG and converted it to DivX 6, because they offered the encoder for free once. Result was OK, but I guess PlayStation3 and 360 owners don't like those. In either case I still had to sync the result with some AAC or AC3 audio, and I see no tool on the Mac that would do that conveniently. What really drives me nuts is that Apple offers free HD cutting but says nothing about distribution. You want your folks to watch the HD cut? Stream it back to your cam! Want others to watch the HD cut? *Pay* for Apple's "me" website service and upload an QuickTime encoded HD video there. I guess the max resolution there is 720p, and I am not even sure about that one. What they are really talking about is uploading stuff to YouTube and your iPhone. Then there's Adobes Encore CS3, which I don't own either. I heard it sucks, but people say Encore CS4 for Mac is far better. Then you have Roxio's author&burn stuff, but I did not check on those. But those would only get you a BR DVD which puts you in the licencing hassle. In the past people wrote e-mails to the BR Association stating their case: a) BRD producer owns the material b) low quantity BRD production c) free give away. BRA says no fees, but now try to make the case for stealth video recordings. No members have liked this post.
Last edited by KustMichaels; 2008-09-18 at 01:03 PM. |
#32
|
||||
|
||||
Re: What about High Definition streams?
Quote:
No members have liked this post.
|
#33
|
||||
|
||||
Re: What about High Definition streams?
Quote:
also, i think Handbrake accepts .m2ts files, but i'm not positive...i've heard that the newest version has an h.264 encoder that is damn good, especially considering its freeware Compressor is lacking in just about everything except SD DVD encoding [and its quality is arguable at times]...either Apple is gonna have to make some major revisions, or that program will cease to be used by anyone in the profession No members have liked this post.
|
#34
|
||||
|
||||
Re: What about High Definition streams?
I red somewhere that next release of Apple's DVD Studio Pro will include BD. If it is as good as SD version then... eh.. I wish I have a Mac
No members have liked this post.
|
#35
|
||||
|
||||
Re: What about High Definition streams?
i've heard the same...dunno when that release date is tho
No members have liked this post.
|
#36
|
|||||
|
|||||
Re: What about High Definition streams?
Quote:
Here is one FAQ, here is another. A quote that is often tossed around is this: Quote:
Another matter is throwing the BR logo on a package, like the guys over at bootlegcoverart.com would do, that can't be legal, I'd say watch out. Another matter is HDCP and AACS. Afair most if not all HD TV streams have the HDCP flag enabled. I don't know if by burning a BRD the flag gets removed. Fact is that most stand alone player manufacturers respect the HDCP flag to get their products approved. Thankfully HDCP is coming slowly, afair it was 2015 where manufacturers are not longer allowed to produce players with analog = no copy protection signals. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Rumor also says that Apple might even leave the Mac video market to Adobe, but I doubt that. However, Adobe is there with CS3 and CS4 now, but they are not obliged to give customers legal advice.Workflow is FCP -> Compressor -> Encore CS4 -> Toast9+Plugin. I wonder what fidelity can be reached by that for menus for example. People say you can only use Roxio's design templates, and those suck. I do not own the latter two apps and don't plan to. Let's also not forget that all the Java code on BR discs right now is alpha-ish beta 0.3 software. I wonder what progress on that front means for us. I'd love to look at FFmpegX/mencoder which I guess is the highest quality x264 encoding on the Mac right now - and it's free. But that's rocket science I don't have the time for. No members have liked this post.
Last edited by KustMichaels; 2008-09-19 at 11:36 AM. |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Re: What about High Definition streams?
I would like to add a comment.
I am not sure that targetting a medium (BR in that case) is a good idea. Currently we are getting shows on DVD. Whatever the source is, the person who wants to share it has to make a DVD. First, it is either PAL or NTSC. Secondly, they generally limit the size to 4Gb to use only one single layer writable DVD : we are getting downgraded shows. Even though we do not have such limits currently with BR it will happen someday. I think that we mostly agree that FLAC is good format for audio. We would need such a format for video streams so that we could get rid of both DVDs and BRs. The DVD player I am currenly using owns a USB port. I can currently plug a 8Gb usb key and watch a video stream or a DVD structure (not good though). Internet Boxes are able to play video streams right on the TV or check the AppleTV! Therefore, we should not care about media, but the file format. No members have liked this post.
|
#38
|
||||
|
||||
Re: What about High Definition streams?
Greatoak, BR uses m2ts container. A playable disc needs correct folder structure + leading / control sequences which can be added even by some freewares, at least there are PC tools. It gets complicated as far as more advanced authoring is concerned - interactive menus. BR will use special Java engine of which, if I'm right, specification is not free / public. As Kust wrote above, industry wants to control everything, and it's not happy to pass know how to the consumer level as it's with DVD format.
No members have liked this post.
|
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Re: What about High Definition streams?
Pawel... I far as I understand, you are going in the same direction as I am... BR is not a good choice.
Is my understanding correct? No members have liked this post.
|
#40
|
||||
|
||||
Re: What about High Definition streams?
^ Yes, but it doesn't mean that I like to have any type of container to be the carrier. MP4 and MKV are good, and compact but they may contain anything, and this may cause problems for the site like TTD.
No members have liked this post.
|
#41
|
||||
|
||||
Re: What about High Definition streams?
help me understand why MP4 and MKV (and perhaps other containers) might cause issues.
If a factual HD FPS/bitrate is given in the info.. I mean.. who, what, why would someone think they could pass it off as HD video when its .. say divx.. I mean, it seems it would 'be an instant bust' saying something is one thing - when its low quality compressed video. also, the trading community is very good at dealing with 'these people' when it happens why worry. you have to have failth in the users who share out - and this early in the game.. its not going to be that many people anyway. As time moves on, the HD video camera format will come together to a standardization. Its just early in the game now.. so the question is more..what makes it easiest for the traders to trade what they have ? am i reading correctly that mac users dont have BR author software yet ?! thats blows my mind. No members have liked this post.
Last edited by direwolf-pgh; 2008-09-19 at 10:30 PM. |
#42
|
||||
|
||||
Re: What about High Definition streams?
Chew on this....Right Click and Save As....
http://home.comcast.net/~simms3/DCFC...Dark-1080i.mp4 It's 288mb for 3min 17sec. Suggested player is MPC as you can change the audio from the default synced external audio or the camera audio. No members have liked this post.
|
#43
|
||||
|
||||
Re: What about High Definition streams?
you should post a recommended player/codec link with this please ^^
MPC = (easily googled as) Media Player Classic and that just aint gonna do it for folks. 12258/kbps 1081i - looking good No members have liked this post.
|
#44
|
||||
|
||||
Re: What about High Definition streams?
Quote:
* Matroska: no issues, great container, except that there are no standalone players. No members have liked this post.
|
#45
|
|||
|
|||
Re: What about High Definition streams?
Quote:
__________________
Two tracks for a desert island: Black Keys - I Got Mine Tintern Abbey - Vacuum Cleaner No members have liked this post.
|
The Traders' Den |
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
High Definition poll - AAR.oner | Technobabble | 9 | 2008-10-25 01:27 AM | |
Motorola Dual-Tuner DVR High-Definition DCT6412 - Black Dog | Technobabble | 1 | 2005-10-18 10:09 AM |
|
|