|
|
| Technobabble Post your general Need for Help questions here.
• Lossy or Lossless? Moderators |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
#31
2005-07-14, 02:31 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: SBE fix gives different result with shntool & flac front-end?
indeed.. more precisely it clears "half as much of the buffer as it should" because it incorrectly assumes that input_ bps = bps of the input file (16) while the actual bps of the input_ buffer is 32
so in my case it cleared the first 392 / 2 = 196 samples of the 2048 sample input buffer instead of 392 samples - note that (bps >> 3) is the same as (bps / 8), samples 196-391 (and onwards to sample number 2047) of the input buffer remain from the previously read block of samples. No members have liked this post.
|
|
#32
2005-08-30, 06:19 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: SBE fix gives different result with shntool & flac front-end?
I've just heard from Josh Coalson (the FLAC developer) that he's now fixed this bug in the CVS version of FLAC.
I don't know anywhere that offers pre-compiled binaries of the FLAC CVS, but it also means that next official release will be OK. Dave. No members have liked this post.
|
|
#33
2005-08-30, 10:52 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: SBE fix gives different result with shntool & flac front-end?
Quote:
No members have liked this post.
|
|
| The Traders' Den |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Flac Front End - Cantrip | Technobabble | 9 | 2008-04-04 08:12 PM | |
| Problem with source material result code = -18771 - billysera | Technobabble | 1 | 2006-06-26 10:21 PM | |
|
|
